בית משפט

איך פותחים תיק גירושין?

אנחנו חיים בעולם בו האנשים כל הזמן משתנים. כך לדוגמא אפשר לראות כי אדם אשר היה בעל מקצוע לפני חמש שנים היום עובד בדבר אחר לגמרי. השינויים הם לא רק בתחום הקריירה אלא גם בעולם האישי והפרטי שלנו. אדם אשר נמצא בזוגיות לפני חמש שנים עם אישה יכול להיות בזוגיות כיום עם אישה אחרת לגמרי. כמובן שאם הבן אדם היה נשוי אז הוא צריך להתגרש בכדי להיות עם אישה אחרת לפחות על פי הדת היהודית. על רקע זה עולה השאלה החשובה ביותר והיא איך פותחים תיק גירושין? אם כן אתם צריכים להבין כי הליך פתיחת התיק הוא לא קשה ומורכב וכל שאתם צריכים לעשות זה לפנות אל בית הדין לענייני משפחה או בית הדין הרבני ואז לפתוח את התיק שם על פי ההוראות של המוסד שאליו פניתם.

 

האם אישה צריכה גם כן לשלם מזונות?

עד לפני כמה שנים היה נהוג כי רק הגבר משלם מזונות וכי האישה לא צריכה בכלל לשלם כלום. המצב הזה התשנה בצורה דרמטית ויותר ויותר נשים נדרשות לשלם מזונות. כאשר בית המשפט או בית הדין הרבני מחליטים שהאישה תשלם מזונות הם למעשה בוחנים שני דברים שעל פיהם הם מחליטים כיצד לנהוג. קודם כל הם בודקים מה המשמורת בין בני הזוג ובהנחה שהיא משמורת משותפת אזי גם האישה צריכה לשלם מזונות לגבר. עוד דבר שהם בוחנים זה השאלה כמה כסף מרוויחה האישה. אם היא מרוויחה הרבה אזי יש סיכוי גדול יותר שהיא תשלם מזונות לאב ולא רק האב ישלם.

 

מדוע כל כך כדאי להיכנס לאתר מוסכם?

עליכם לדעת כי הליך גירושין הוא מורכב וקשה וסבוך ובדיוק בשביל זה הוקם מרכז הגישור מוסכם אשר אפשר להיכנס אליו בלינק הבא: https://muskam.co.il. באתר תמצאו מידע מקיף על פתרון סכסוכים משפטיים כמו גירושין באמצעות גישור. מוסכם הוא המרכז המוביל בארץ בתחום של גישור ועובדים אצלו המומחים הגדולים ביותר בארץ בתחום הגישור. המומחים של מוסכם מחזיקים בניסיון עצום ויש להם את היכולת לפתור כל סכסוך ללא ריבים ומחלוקות. אם אתם מחפשים אחר המקצוענים הטובים בתחום אין ספק כי אתם חייבים להכיר את מוסכם ואת המומחים של המרכז. איכות היא הדבר שמאפיין אותנו לצד מקצוענות עצומה ובכך אנו גאים במיוחד ותודות לכך אנו המרכז לגישור המוביל בארץ.

 

האם עלות של מגשר היא גבוהה?

עליכם לדעת כי באופן יחסי העלות של מגשר היא לא גבוהה בכלל. כיום אפשר לשכור את השירותים של מגשר בסכומים הרבה יותר נמוכים מעלות של ניהול משפט בבית הדין הרבני או בבית דין לענייני משפחה וזה יתרון עצום למי שרוצה לחסוך כסף ועדיין לקבל תוצאות מעולות בתחום הגירושין.

 

זוג עם ילדים

Is Alcover only prescribable in acute abstinence? Statement by the National SITD Directorate

a recent decision by the Scientific Technical Committee of AIFA, the Italian agency of the drug, may lead to a restriction of the indications authorized for Alcover .

In practice it would only be indicated in acute withdrawal syndrome, and it would no longer be possible to use it in later stages, such as anticraving and to prevent relapse .

It is easy to understand how such a change worries the addiction clinicians. The drug has been in use in Italy for almost thirty years without significant problems, and has allowed thousands of people to free themselves from alcohol addiction. Such a restriction of indications would not only deprive addiction medicine of a unique instrument (there are no other drugs authorized in Italy for alcoholism with the same pharmacodynamic profile) but would pose a serious problem for existing drug treatments, for which one should hypothesize a suspension with times and modalities all to be determined, and a concrete risk of inducing relapse into alcoholism .

For this reason, the SITD National Executive issued a press release that we report below and also in printable PDF.

We invite members and clinicians interested in contacting AIFA through the online form made available to health professionals indicating their personal details, the company and the membership service, and their motivated opinion on this restriction of indications.

To WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

SITD COMMUNICATION FOLLOWING THE AIFA DECISION " Outcome Area Supervision Post Marketing CTS 29, 30 and 31 October 2018"

In recent days we have been informed that during the CTS meeting of 29-30-31 us, among the various drugs analyzed, a restriction of the indications of use of the drug Alcover oral solution was proposed .

Recall that the drug is distributed both in Italy and in Austria. In particular, in Italy it has been prescribed since 1991. The use of this drug during these 27 years has marked a fundamental and significant step in the pharmacological treatment of alcohol use disorder associated with psychosocial interventions (Biggio et al., 1992; Ferrara et al., 1992; Gallimberti et al., 1992; June et al., 1995; Addolorato et al., 1996, 1999, Beghè and Carpanini, 2000; Gessa et al., 2000; Stella et al., 2008) . Currently it is used with good results both for the treatment of the withdrawal syndrome and for the maintenance of abstention from alcohol, in particular in subjects with very high risk alcohol consumption (more than 100 g / day of alcohol for men) and more than 60 g / day of alcohol for women).(Gallimberti et al., 1989; Addolorato et al., 1996, 1998, 1999; Moncini et al., 2000; Nimmerrichter et al., 2002; Caputo et al., 2003, 2007; Nava et al., 2007; al., 2001, 2008, 2011; Maremmani et al., 2001, 2011, Cacciaglia et al., 2013; Skala et al., 2014, Caputo et al., 2015) .

Among the various treatments available, the Alcover is a therapeutic device of proven efficacy, witnessed by thousands of patients and numerous works in the literature (Addolorato et al., 1996; Stella et al., 2001, 2008; Keating, 2014; den Brink et al., 2018, etc.) , in an extremely disabling pathology, both in terms of life expectancy and in terms of social and health costs, direct or indirect (Rehm et al., 2018).

The limitation of therapeutic indications would certainly create a problem with unforeseeable consequences with a serious risk to the health of patients with alcohol dependence . In fact, the reduction of the indications given only for use in the abstinence crisis, would preclude treatment for a significant number of alcoholic patients with possible repercussions on the functioning of the Services with serious consequences for both health care workers and patients. It will be necessary to understand how it will be possible to guarantee the therapeutic continuity for the thousands and thousands of patients in maintenance treatment for the control of craving and how to manage a phase of transition that should lead to prescribe the drug only in control of withdrawal symptoms.

It is therefore obvious that, according to the above, our Company would urge all the Authors involved in the issue of reconsidering this decision, so that professionals can continue to prescribe in science and conscience the drug as happened in this almost last thirty years. , avoiding further unnecessary problems also because many have been told that denying access to the best care is a crime against humanity .

November 16, 2018

The National Direction
SITD Società Italiana Tossicodipendenze

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ADDOLORATO, Giovanni, et al. An open multicentric study evaluating 4-hydroxybutyric acid sodium salt in the medium-term treatment of 179 alcohol dependent subjects. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 1996, 31.4: 341-345.

ADDOLORATO, Giovanni, et al. Maintaining abstinence from alcohol with γ-hydroxybutyric acid. The Lancet, 1998, 351.9095: 38.

ADDOLORATO, Giovanni, et al. γ-Hydroxybutyric acid in the treatment of alcoholism: dosage fractioning utilities in non-responders alcoholic patients. Drug and alcohol dependence, 1998, 53.1: 7-10.

ADDOLORATO, Giovanni, et al. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a randomized comparative study versus benzodiazepine. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 1999, 23.10: 1596-1604.

BEGHÈ, Franco; CARPANINI, Maria Teresa. Safety and tolerability of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid in the treatment of alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol, 2000, 20.3: 223-225.

BIGGIO, Giovanni, et al. Suppression of voluntary alcohol intake in rats and alcoholics by gamma-hydroxybutyric acid: a non-GABAergic mechanism. Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, 1992, 47: 281-288.

CACCIAGLIA, Roberto et al., P30gate 2 Study: Sodium Oxybate in the Maintenance of Alcohol Abstinence and Prevention of Alcohol Relapse. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 2013, 48.suppl_1: i46-i49.

CAPUTO, Fabio, et al. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid versus naltrexone in maintaining alcohol abstinence: an open randomized comparative study. Drug and alcohol dependence, 2003, 70.1: 85-91.

The 2 main benefits of mediation during a divorce case

One of the most common types of cases that are heard in family court are divorce cases. Whereas many people assume such cases must be messy, this is a wrong assumption because mediation is a better option, and more and more couples are beginning to enjoy its benefits which are a way better option than going through a messy divorce case in open court.

Mediation is basically the bringing in of an impartial party to oversee the negotiations that are being done by the divorcing couple. The mediator’s job is essentially to find a middle ground for the couple so that they can reach an amicable agreement especially on the issues that have been heavily contested.

Here are the 2 main benefits of mediation during a divorce case.

Mediation will tremendously bring down costs

Investor working new startup project. Finance meeting. Business team present.

Divorce cases can be expensive. In fact, they are very expensive. When a couple calculates how much each of them spends on their lawyers, as well as on all the court related costs in addition to the time, they will realize that this cost is too high. That money could have been used on so many other activities that are beneficial to the family. Statistics indicate that a couple will save between 40% and 60% if they instead go through mediation. This is because the process does not carry the burden of court related costs, and you can also do it without your lawyer present hence save significantly on your legal costs. Even if you opt to have your lawyer present, the billable hours will be much less in comparison to a trial.

Mediation has much better results for the children

Generally, the biggest loser in a divorce case is usually the children. Whichever way it plays out, they will still end up with a split family and feeling as though they have to choose between their parents.A trial in open court will end up much worse for them especially if the parents decide to tear into each other which is often the case. This can all be avoided by mediation. If this process is done well and it’s successful, the kids will enjoy the benefit of peace of mind as they see their parents amicably settling their differences and handling their disagreement in a more mature way.

As you are consulting a family lawyer to take up your divorce case, it’s advisable to have an open discussion with them on which between mediation and open court will bring a much better outcome for you as well as your family.